|
When you see the triangle below on the left and someone asks you to find
the value of x, you immediately know how to proceed. You call
upon your friend the Pythagorean Theorem because you see the right
angle.
 |
But what do you do when you see
the triangle on the right? There is no indication of a
right angle.
Now, with our knowledge of
trigonometry, we are armed to attack any of these perplexing
problems! |
 |
Let's see how to apply trigonometry to
working in triangles which do not contain a right angle.
 |
In this diagram, notice how the
triangle is labeled. The capital letters for the vertices
are repeated in small case on the side opposite the
corresponding vertex.
|
side a is opposite <A
side b is opposite <B
side c is opposite <C |
|
working
together as partners! |
|
|
The ratios of each side to the sine of
its "partner" are equal to each other.
These ratios, in pairs, are applied
to solving problems. You never need to use all three ratios at the same time.
Mix and match the ratios to correspond with the letters you need.
Remember when working with proportions, the product of the means
equals the product of the extremes (cross multiply).

Example 1:
In
, side a
= 8, m<A = 30º and m<C = 55º. Find side c
to the nearest tenth of an integer.
 |
Since this problem refers to two angles
and two sides, use the Law of Sines.


|
|
This answer makes sense,
since the larger side is opposite the larger angle. |

Example 2:
Find the length of side d.
 |
Again, we are working with two
sides and two angles.
Use the Law of Sines:


|

Example 3:
Using the Law of Sines:


The ratio of side p to side q is 4 to 3.

If the problem asks to find a missing
angle, there is another step required for the solution.
Example 4:
In the diagram, a = 55, c = 20, and m<A
= 110º. Find the measure of <C to the nearest degree.
Unfortunately, this is NOT the answer!!
NEW STEP: Using
C = sin-1(.342), we have C = 19.999 = 20º
(Since triangle ABC already has an
obtuse angle of 110 degrees, we can eliminate the notion that sin is
also positioned in Quadrant II, which would give us a second obtuse
angle.
|